Previously, I believed that the parents of 1050811Joan ___ were 2101622Thomas de Dene and 2101623Martha de Shelving. However, researcher Pete Andrews called my attention to 2101622Thomas' inquisitions post mortem, which I had overlooked. 2101622Thomas' two IPM's strongly suggest that he is not 1050811Joan's father (since the IPM explicitly notes 2101622Thomas' daughter Joan as deceased in early childhood, among other incongruences).

Nevertheless, because 1050811Joan certainly seems to be related to 2101622Thomas in some manner, and because my older work could prove useful for future research, I've isolated the profile pages that I'd written for 1050811Joan's formerly proposed ancestors into a separate section of my website, starting from the old version of Joan's page onward.

You can see a list of those ancestors or a family tree of them.
8406495Beatrice de Hougham
Key Facts
Parents:16812990Robert de Hugham
16812991Beatrice ___
Born:roughly circa 1250
location unknown
Died:unknown
Buried:unknown

8406494Beatrice de Hougham is the daughter of 16812990Robert de Hougham and 16812991Beatrice ___, as explained below. As you'll see, her brother Robert was born circa 1250, so we can use this as a rough estimate of 8406494Beatrice's birth-year, too.

Problem: Resolved
Who is 8406494Beatrice's father?

The inquisition post mortem for Robert de Hugham, the writ for which is dated 6 May 1317, mentions several relationships that can be summarized as follows.1 (For reference, "Beatrice Bourne" is the subject of this page, "John de Schelgge" is 4203246John de Shelving, and "Benedicta" is 4203247Benedicta Bourne.)

Robert de Hugham's age and parents had been stated in a different record in 1314,2 and a 1301 inquisition post mortem further confirms who his father was,3 so we can update the pedigree as follows.

The elder Robert de Hugham (i.e., whose IPM writ was issued in April 13013) is mentioned as a son and heir of (yet another man named) 16812990Robert de Hugham in two earlier IPM's: one for which a writ was issued on 26 July 1258,4 and another for a writ issued 16 April 1274.5 Using information therein, we can revise the pedigree further:

Therefore, 8406494Beatrice's father must have been 16812990Robert de Hugham. No document explicitly states that 8406494Beatrice's mother was 16812991Beatrice ___, but this is a reasonable assumption considering the repetition of the name "Beatrice" and the information presented above.

8406495Beatrice married 8406494John Bourne, as explained below.

Problem: Resolved
Who is 8406495Beatrice's husband? (Also, who is 4203247Benedicta's father?)

8406495Beatrice's daughter 4203247Benedicta brought property at Bishopsbourne into her marriage with 4203246John de Shelving.6

Where did this Bishopsbourne property come from? How did 4203247Benedicta acquire it?

It doesn't seem to have come from 8406495Beatrice's inheritance, since none of her father's inquisitions post mortems mention it.4,5 Therefore, one might suspect that 4203247Benedicta inherited it from her (unidentified) father. Whoever this man was, he probably had the name Bourne or de Bourne, since 8406495Beatrice is identified as "Beatrice Bourne" in a later record.1 Since 4203247Benedicta was born circa 1293,1 ideally we would hope to prove that this man owned property in Bishopsbourne around the same period.

Fortunately, we do have one record that matches all the expected criteria: On 20 August 1289, 8406494John de Burne was granted free warren for his lands in Bourne (i.e., Bishopsbourne), Hegham, and Duddington in Kent.7

Since we already know that 8406495Beatrice married a (de) Bourne,1 and since 4203247Benedicta seems to have inherited the Bishopsbourne property from 8406494John de Burne, one may conclude with confidence that 8406495Beatrice was married to 8406494John, and together they had their daughter 4203247Benedicta.

Sources Cited:

1: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem and Other Analogous Documents, Volume VI, Edward II (1904), pages 6-7, entry #20 (for Robert de Hugham). The writ was issued on 6 May 1317, and the inquisition was held on 30 June.

2: UK National Archives reference C 134/45/4. I have not seen the original record. As you can see, the National Archives' description states that Robert is the son and heir of Robert de Hugham. Although lacking a proper source citation, Walter Goodwin Davis' book The Ancestry of Mary Isaac, c. 1549-1613: Wife of Thomas Appleton of Little Waldingfield, Co. Suffolk and Mother of Samuel Appleton of Ipswich, Massachusetts on page 131 includes a description that seems to match this record: "Robert proved his age June 12, 1315—that he was born at Hougham in 21 Edward I [1292-1293], the son of Sir Robert and Lady Alice de Hougham—and he received livery of his father's lands on July 18, 1316."

3: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem and Other Analogous Documents Preserved in the Public Record Office, Volume IV: Edward I (London, 1913), pages 16-17, entry #36

4: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem [...], Volume I, page 109, entry #813

5: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem [...], Volume II: Edward I (London, 1906), pages 41-42, entry #58

6: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem and Other Analogous Documents, Volume VII, Edward III (1909), page 212, entry #292. The writ was issued on 6 February 1329/30.

7: Calendar of the Charter Rolls Preserved in the Public Record Office, Volume II: Henry III - Edward I, A.D. 1257-1300 (London, 1906), 389