Previously, I believed that the parents of 1050811Joan ___ were 2101622Thomas de Dene and 2101623Martha de Shelving. However, researcher Pete Andrews called my attention to 2101622Thomas' inquisitions post mortem, which I had overlooked. 2101622Thomas' two IPM's strongly suggest that he is not 1050811Joan's father (since the IPM explicitly notes 2101622Thomas' daughter Joan as deceased in early childhood, among other incongruences).

Nevertheless, because 1050811Joan certainly seems to be related to 2101622Thomas in some manner, and because my older work could prove useful for future research, I've isolated the profile pages that I'd written for 1050811Joan's formerly proposed ancestors into a separate section of my website, starting from the old version of Joan's page onward.

You can see a list of those ancestors or a family tree of them.
16812990Robert de Hugham
Key Facts
Parents:uncertain; see notes below
Born:unknown
Died:by 26 July 1258
Kent, England
Buried:unknown

Problem: Unresolved
Who are 16812990Robert's parents?

Walter Goodwin Davis' book The Ancestry of Mary Isaac, 1549-1613 on pages 130-131 presents some evidence that 16812990Robert's father was probably likewise named Robert de Hougham, based mostly on a fee from 1242-1243 that reads, "Heres Roberti de Hugham dimidium feodum in Boton'," 1 combined with a record that proves that 16812990Robert (or his estate) owned Bocton as of 1258.2

The 1242-1243 fee is persuasive, but you may notice that this fee record is somewhat unusual: Most of the nearby fees explicitly state the name of the individual in question (rather than simply "heir of ___"). Other heres records often still at least mention other family members, may add filii ___, etc.

16812990Robert de Hugham was married to 16812991Beatrice ___.3

16812990Robert had died in Kent3 by 26 July 1258,2 when a writ was issued for an inquisition post mortem of his estate.2 The inquisition shows that he held property at Boughton, Boxley, Farleigh, and Maidstone.2

For reasons not clear to me, a second inquisition was ordered on 16 April 1274.* Even stranger, the second IPM mentions some different properties than the first; it mentions Boughton, Hugham, and Weavering in Kent and Doleham in Sussex.3

Footnotes:

*
At first glance, one might suspect that the two IPM's2,3 pertain to two different decedents of the same name. However, notice that the second IPM explicitly states, "seventeen years ago, the said Robert died," 3 which thus aligns with the date of the first IPM.2 The stated ages of 16812990Robert's son Robert are also consistent between the two IPM's.

Sources Cited:

1: Liber Feodorum: The Book of Fees Commonly Called Testa de Nevill [...]: Part II, A.D. 1242-1293 (London, 1923), page 679, an entry that reads, "Heres Roberti de Hugham dimidium feodum in Boton'."

2: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem [...], Volume I, page 109, entry #813

3: Calendar of Inquisitions Post Mortem [...], Volume II: Edward I (London, 1906), pages 41-42, entry #58