PAGE 135: Edelina de Broce per attornatum suum optulit se quarto die versus Sibillam del Broc de placito quare non tenet ei finem factum apud Wintoniam tempore domini Johannis regis patris in curia sua inter ipsam Sibillam et Stephanum de Turnham et ipsam Edelinam de rationabili parte ipsius Sibille quam ipsa clamavit versus ipsos Stephanum et Edelinam de tota hereditate que fuit Ranulfi del Broc patris predictarum Edeline et Sibille, et de rationabili parte ipsius Sibille quam ipsa clamavit versus eosdem Stephanum et Edelinam de tota hereditate que fuit Damete de Gorum matris ipsarum Edeline et Sibille, unde cirographum factum fuit inter eos etc. Et Sibilla non venit etc., et habuit diem per essoniatorem suum ete. Et ideo ponatur per meliores plegios quod sit a die sancti Hillarii in xv. dies etc. ; et primi etc., scilicet Andreas de Mora et Willelmus de Crideton’. -- Edelina de Broce, by her attorney, offered herself on the fourth day against Sibilla del Broc, concerning the plea, why she does not keep the fine made at Wintonia in the time of Lord John, the king's father, in her court, between Sibilla herself and Stephen de Turnham, and Edelina herself, on the reasonable part of Sibilla, whom she called towards Stephen and Edeline themselves concerning the whole inheritance which was Ranulfi del Broc's, father of the aforesaid Edeline and Sibille, and concerning the reasonable part of Sibille himself which she pled towards the same Stephen and Edeline concerning the whole inheritance which belonged to Dame de Gorum of the mothers themselves, Edeline and Sibille, whence a bond was made between them, etc. And Sibylla did not come, etc., and had a day through her sonorator. And therefore it is supposed by the better pleadings that it is from the day of St. Hillary in xv. day etc. ; and the first, etc., namely Andrew de Mora and William de Crideton. ========== PAGE 216: Salop’—Dies datus est Edeline de Broce petenti per attornatum suum et Sibille de Broc per attornatum suum de placito servitii a die Pasche in tres septimanas prece partium. -- Salop'—A day was granted to Edeline de Broce petitioned by her attorney and Sibille de Broc by her attorney for a plea of service from Easter day in three weeks for the parties. ========== PAGE 362: Surr’.—Ricardus Malherbe optulit se quarto die versus Thomam de Bavelingeham in Kent et Mabiliam uxorem ejus Adam de Bending’ et Aliciam uxorem ejus Radulfum de Fay in Kent et Beatriciam uxorem ejus Rogerum de Leyburn et Aliciam uxorem ejus Radulfum filium Bernardi et Alienoram uxorem ejus de placito quod warentizent ei iiij. libratas et Xvilj. solidatas redditus cum pertinentiis in Ertindon’ , quas Edelina de Broc clamat versus ipsum Ricardum et unde idem Ricardus vocat eas ad warantum etc. Et Thomas et Mabilia Radulfus de Fay et uxor ejus non venerunt etc. ; et habuerunt diem per essoniatorem suum etc. Et ideo consideratum est quod de terra Thome in comitatu Kant’ ad valentiam xix. solidatarum redditus et vij. denariatarum cum pertinentiis d hereditate [que] fuit predicti Stephani etc., et versus Radulfum et uxorem ejus ad valentiam xix. [solidatarum] redditus et vij. denariatarum cum pertinentiis etc., et dies etc.; et ips[i] summoneantur quod sint a die sancte Trinitatis in xv. dies etc. Idem dies datus est Radulfo filio Bernardi attornato uxoris ejus et Ade de Bendeng’ et uxori ejus per attornatum suum. eo quod nolunt respondere sine participibus suis. Et sciendum quod Rogerus de Leiburn’ habuit unam heredum predicti Stephani, que obiit; set quia ipse habuit filium de ea, sustineatur de eo quousque sciatur de warentia. Magister Willelmus de Bathonia optulit se quarto die versus eosdem warantos de placito quod warentizent ei xxj. acras terre et unam acram prati et xij. acras et dimidiam de bosco cum pertinentiis in eadem villa : et ipsi non venerunt, sicut predictum est. Et ideo capiantur in manum domini regis super Thomam iiij. acre terre et quintam partem j. acre et quinta pars j. acre prati et due acre bosci et dimidia, et super Radulfum et uxorem ejus eodem modo, et dies etc.; et ipsi summoneantur etc. ad eundem terminum. Idem [dies] datus est aliis; et dictum est eis quod nullum jacet essonium, eo quod loqela tantam cepit dilationem. Et Ricardus et Willelmus ponunt loco suo Nicholaum Brun etc. -- Surr'.—Richard Malherbe offered himself on the fourth day against Thomas de Bavelingham in Kent and Mabilia his wife Adam de Bending' and Alice his wife Ralph de Fay in Kent and Beatrice his wife Roger de Leyburn and Alice his wife Ralph son of Bernard and Eleanor his wife of his plea that they warrant him iiij. balanced and Xvilj the joint rent with the appurtenances in Ertindon, which Edelina de Broc claims against Richard himself, and whence the same Richard calls them to warrant, etc. And Thomas and Mabilia Ralph de Fay and his wife did not come, etc. ; and they had a day by their essonator, etc. And therefore it was considered that of the land of Thomas in the county of Kant to the effect of xix. consolidated revenue and vij. of denarii with the appurtenances of the inheritance [which] belonged to the aforesaid Stephen, etc., and towards Ralph and his wife to the extent of xix. [solidarity] rent and vij. of denarii with appurtenances, etc., and days, etc.; and let them [i] be summoned as they are from the day of the holy Trinity in xv. day etc. The same day was given to Ralph son of Bernard his wife's attorney and Ade de Bendeng' and his wife by his attorney. because they do not want to answer without their participants. And it should be known that Roger de Leiburn had one heir of the aforesaid Stephen, who died; but because he himself had a son by her, let him be supported as long as the warranty is known. Master William of Bathonia offered himself on the fourth day against the same warrants of the plea that warranted him xxj. acres of land and one acre of meadow and xij. acres and a half of the forest with the appurtenances in the same town: and they themselves did not come, as was aforesaid. And therefore let them be taken into the hand of the lord the king upon Thomas iiij. an acre of land and a fifth part j. acre and a fifth part j an acre of meadow and two acres of wood and a half, and over Ralph and his wife in the same manner, and days, etc.; and let them themselves be summoned, etc. to the same term. The same [day] was given to others; and it was said to them that there was no Essonium, because the speech had taken such a long time. And Richard and William put Nicholas Brun in their place, etc. ========== PAGE 363: ciariis etc. ipsam Edelinam ad warantum versus eos et quam terram idem Henricus amisit per defaltam ipsius Edeline, unde idem Henricus profert cartam ipsius Edeline. que testatur quod ipsa in libera potestate sua et omnino quieta de marito dedit etc. Henrico de Braybof' Tet Clementie uxori ejus totum manerium de Piperhargh' cum omnibus pertinentiis suis et preterea gravam de Ledlinges et gravam de Sakeleford’ habendum et tenendum ipsi Henrico et heredibus suis de ipsa et de heredibus [suis] totum predictum manerium cum pertinentiis et cum gravis etc.; et ipsa warentizabit eidem Henrico et heredibus suis etc. contra omnes homines etc. Et hac ratione petit quod ei warentizet terram illam. Et Edelina venit et dicit quod non debet terram illam ei warentizare, quia ipsa nunquam illam ei dedit nec dare potuit, quia ipsa nunquam inde seisinam habuit ita quod eam dare posset, quia Stephanus vir suus dedit terram illam in maritagium cum Clementia filia sua Alano de Plugenhay. qui illam tenuit tota vita sua; et post eum Waundricus de Curcell’ duxit eam in uxorem et habuit eandem terram cum illa terra; et, defuncto Waundrico, idem Henricus duxit eam in uxorem et eandem terram cepit cum ea ut maritagium ipsius Clementie ; et nunquam ad eam postea reversa fuit; unde bene defendit quod ipsa nunquam fuit seisita de terra illa ita quod eam dare posset. Et inde ponit se super juratam patrie. Et Henricus venit et dicit quod ipsa fuit seisita de terra illa die quo ipsa donum illud ei fecit, ita quod predicta Clementia reddiderat ipsi Edeline terram illam, eo quod eam injuste ceperat ; et ipsa Edelina terram illam ei dedit. sicut predictum est. apud Cattehull’ et [in] libera potestate sua, et inde producit sectam, scilicet Henricum le Sauvage Thomam de Naketon’ Rogerum le Cauceis Reginaldum Clericum Radulfum de Port. qui interfuerunt ubi ipsa donum illud ei fecit. Et, si hoc non sufficit, offert dirationare per corpus predicti Henrici le Sauvage, qui hoc offert dirationare per corpus suum etc. ut ille qui interfuit et hoc vidit. Dies datus est eis de audiendo judicio suo a die sancte Trinitatis in xv. dies etc. Edelina ponit loco suo Henricum de Winterhull’ etc. Consideratum est quod inquiratur per sacramentum xij. hominum si ipsa Edelina unquam fuit seisita in dominico ut de feodo de terra illa postquam terra illa data fuit Alano de Plugenai in maritagium cum ipsa Clementia. ita quod ipsa Edelina eam dare posset ipsi Henrico, vel non. Et veniat jurata in xv. dies post festum sancti Michaelis. -- ciarii etc. Edeline herself as a warrant against them, and which land the same Henry lost through Edeline's default, whence the same Henry brings forth the same Edeline's charter. which is evidenced by the fact that she, in her own free power and completely at peace with her husband, gave, etc. To Henry de Braybof, and to Clementie his wife, the whole manor of Piperhargh, with all its appurtenances, and also the burden of Ledlinges and the burden of Sakeleford, to be held and held by Henry himself and his heirs, of herself and her heirs, the whole aforesaid manor with its appurtenances, and with heavy etc.; and she will warrant the same to Henry and his heirs, etc. against all men, etc. And for this reason he asks that he warrant that land to him. And Edelina comes and says that she should not warrant that land to him, because she never gave it to him and could not give it, because she never had seisin from it so that she could give it, because her husband Stephen gave that land in marriage with Clementia, his daughter to Alan de Plugenhay. who held it all his life; and after him Waundric de Curcell married her, and had the same land as that land; and, after the death of Waundric, the same Henry married her and took the same land with her as a dowry for Clementie himself; and she never returned to it afterwards; whence he well defends that she was never seised of that land in such a way that she could give it away. And thence he places himself upon the oath of his country. And Henry comes and says that she was seised of that land on the day that she made that gift to him, so that the aforesaid Clementia had returned that land to Edeline herself, because she had taken it unjustly; and Edelina herself gave him that land. as has been said. at Cattehull' and [in] his free power, and thence produced a suit, namely Henry le Sauvage Thomas de Naketon' Roger le Cauceis Reginald Cleric Ralph de Port who were present when she made that gift to him. And if this is not sufficient, he offers to reason through the body of the aforesaid Henry le Sauvage, who this he offers to radiate through his body, etc. as he who was present and saw this. A day was given to them for hearing their judgment from the day of the holy Trinity in xv. day etc. Edelin puts Henry de Winterhull in his place, etc. It has been considered that it is to be investigated by the sacrament xij. of men if Edelina herself was ever seised in Dominica as a fee from that land after that land was given to Alan de Plugenai in marriage with Clementia herself. so that Edeline herself could give it to Henry himself, or not. And let the oath come in xv. the day after the feast of St. Michael.